<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When are two emails better than one?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://email-overloaded.com/2006/04/10/two-emails-are-sometimes-better-than-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://email-overloaded.com/2006/04/10/two-emails-are-sometimes-better-than-one/</link>
	<description>Itzy Sabo on Email Productivity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:53:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comfortable Communications &#171; Mashup of Mayhem</title>
		<link>http://email-overloaded.com/2006/04/10/two-emails-are-sometimes-better-than-one/#comment-21782</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Comfortable Communications &#171; Mashup of Mayhem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://itzy.wordpress.com/2006/04/10/two-emails-are-sometimes-better-than-one/#comment-21782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] used&#160;properly, &#160;introducing&#160;terrible inefficiently but I&#8217;ll let&#160;&#160;Itzy provide some tips oh how to do things better&#160;and maybe grab my [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] used&nbsp;properly, &nbsp;introducing&nbsp;terrible inefficiently but I&#8217;ll let&nbsp;&nbsp;Itzy provide some tips oh how to do things better&nbsp;and maybe grab my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Singletasking &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Focussed emails</title>
		<link>http://email-overloaded.com/2006/04/10/two-emails-are-sometimes-better-than-one/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Singletasking &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Focussed emails]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 12:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://itzy.wordpress.com/2006/04/10/two-emails-are-sometimes-better-than-one/#comment-99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Multiple emails are better than one if they are short and to the point. That&#8217;s the suggestion by Itsy Sabo in his post &#8216;When are two emails better than one?&#8216; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Multiple emails are better than one if they are short and to the point. That&#8217;s the suggestion by Itsy Sabo in his post &#8216;When are two emails better than one?&#8216; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://email-overloaded.com/2006/04/10/two-emails-are-sometimes-better-than-one/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 12:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://itzy.wordpress.com/2006/04/10/two-emails-are-sometimes-better-than-one/#comment-96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just wanted to share a half-baked thought I had this morning in the shower. I&#039;m one of the folks who uses my e-mail to some extent as a to-do list. I was thinking that if I&#039;m on the receiving end of a multiple-point e-mail, it might be useful to forward it to myself a few times with modified subject headers. 

If I can&#039;t remember exactly what&#039;s going on, I could re-read the message body. If I had some extra time while reviewing the message the first time, I might even be in a position to edit the text to include only the relevant information. 

This way I wouldn&#039;t have to be so much at the whim of other people&#039;s e-mail habits, and I&#039;d resolve the &quot;where do I file it?&quot; problem. As I said, just a thought that I haven&#039;t worked through all the way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to share a half-baked thought I had this morning in the shower. I&#8217;m one of the folks who uses my e-mail to some extent as a to-do list. I was thinking that if I&#8217;m on the receiving end of a multiple-point e-mail, it might be useful to forward it to myself a few times with modified subject headers. </p>
<p>If I can&#8217;t remember exactly what&#8217;s going on, I could re-read the message body. If I had some extra time while reviewing the message the first time, I might even be in a position to edit the text to include only the relevant information. </p>
<p>This way I wouldn&#8217;t have to be so much at the whim of other people&#8217;s e-mail habits, and I&#8217;d resolve the &#8220;where do I file it?&#8221; problem. As I said, just a thought that I haven&#8217;t worked through all the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avi Dardik</title>
		<link>http://email-overloaded.com/2006/04/10/two-emails-are-sometimes-better-than-one/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Avi Dardik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 21:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://itzy.wordpress.com/2006/04/10/two-emails-are-sometimes-better-than-one/#comment-95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I, on the other hand, love the new look!
The older one looked kind of amateurish.
This design is much more up-to-date and meets the high standards some Web users have grown used to.
Excellent job Itzy!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, on the other hand, love the new look!<br />
The older one looked kind of amateurish.<br />
This design is much more up-to-date and meets the high standards some Web users have grown used to.<br />
Excellent job Itzy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://email-overloaded.com/2006/04/10/two-emails-are-sometimes-better-than-one/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 21:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://itzy.wordpress.com/2006/04/10/two-emails-are-sometimes-better-than-one/#comment-94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I liked the overall aesthetic of the last one. The picture was nice. It was a good complement to the subject matter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the overall aesthetic of the last one. The picture was nice. It was a good complement to the subject matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Itzy Sabo</title>
		<link>http://email-overloaded.com/2006/04/10/two-emails-are-sometimes-better-than-one/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Itzy Sabo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 18:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://itzy.wordpress.com/2006/04/10/two-emails-are-sometimes-better-than-one/#comment-92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I switched templates to one that gives more flexibility. Once Wordpress.com starts allowing customizations, I will take full advantage of it. Meanwhile I have to use a canned template.

What would you change?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I switched templates to one that gives more flexibility. Once WordPress.com starts allowing customizations, I will take full advantage of it. Meanwhile I have to use a canned template.</p>
<p>What would you change?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://email-overloaded.com/2006/04/10/two-emails-are-sometimes-better-than-one/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 18:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://itzy.wordpress.com/2006/04/10/two-emails-are-sometimes-better-than-one/#comment-91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Itzy, where&#039;s the old template? I used to feel calm, productive and organized on your site. Now I kind of feel, uh,  not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Itzy, where&#8217;s the old template? I used to feel calm, productive and organized on your site. Now I kind of feel, uh,  not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

